2026 CAA Volleyball Championship
Bracketology·Conference Races·At-Large Odds·NCAA Bracket— auto-bid races, conference by conference.
Reflects results through the preseason. Seeds appear as they clinch; matchups and winners as games are played.
🏟 CAA
First Round
Semifinals
Championship
CAA Tournament Projections(11 teams · 10k simulations)
| Seed | Team | Elo | Quarters | Semis | Final | 🏆 Win |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hofstra | 1682 | 98% | 88% | 58% | 34% |
| 2 | Towson | 1612 | 88% | 67% | 36% | 19% |
| 3 | Campbell | 1591 | 92% | 69% | 35% | 17% |
| 4 | Col. of Charleston | 1576 | 91% | 68% | 34% | 15% |
| 5 | N.C. A&T | 1526 | 74% | 47% | 20% | 9% |
| 6 | Stony Brook | 1417 | 43% | 21% | 7% | 3% |
| 7 | William & Mary | 1393 | 45% | 20% | 6% | 2% |
| 8 | Northeastern | 1316 | 39% | 13% | 3% | 1% |
| 9 | Elon | 1244 | 19% | 6% | 1% | — |
| 10 | UNCW | 1212 | 10% | 3% | 1% | — |
| 11 | Hampton | 850 | — | — | — | — |
Values = P(reach that stage or further). Win = P(win conference tournament = auto NCAA bid). Seeds reflect average simulated finish position.
CAA Standings
6 qualify for tournamentPreseason projection · 88 games remainingStandings · Finishing Position Probabilities
| # | Team | Conf | Overall | Proj Conf | Proj Ovr | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hofstra | 0–0 | 0–0 | 12.7–3.3 11–14 W | 18.1–6.9 17–20 W | 42 | 25 | 14 | 9.3 | 4.5 | 2.6 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.2 | <1 | |
| 2 | Col. of Charleston | 0–0 | 0–0 | 11.3–4.7 10–13 W | 19.4–9.6 18–21 W | 17 | 22 | 19 | 15 | 11 | 6.9 | 4.6 | 2.7 | 1.2 | 0.5 | <1 |
| 3 | Campbell | 0–0 | 0–0 | 11.0–5.0 9–13 W | 17.1–10.9 15–19 W | 16 | 19 | 20 | 17 | 12 | 8.4 | 4.7 | 2.3 | 0.9 | 0.3 | <1 |
| 4 | Towson | 0–0 | 0–0 | 10.7–5.3 9–12 W | 18.9–8.1 17–21 W | 16 | 16 | 18 | 16 | 13 | 9.4 | 6.2 | 3.6 | 1.4 | 0.4 | <1 |
| 5 | N.C. A&T | 0–0 | 0–0 | 9.2–6.8 7–11 W | 17.1–11.9 15–19 W | 6.5 | 10 | 13 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 11 | 7.7 | 4.9 | 2.2 | <1 |
| 6 | William & Mary | 0–0 | 0–0 | 7.4–8.6 6–9 W | 12.6–14.4 11–14 W | 1.2 | 2.9 | 5.4 | 8.2 | 13 | 15 | 17 | 16 | 13 | 7.9 | 0.4 |
| 7 | Stony Brook | 0–0 | 0–0 | 7.2–8.8 5–9 W | 11.8–13.2 10–14 W | 1.6 | 3.2 | 5.1 | 7.9 | 12 | 14 | 16 | 15 | 14 | 11 | 0.8 |
| 8 | Northeastern | 0–0 | 0–0 | 7.1–8.9 5–9 W | 10.4–15.6 9–12 W | 0.3 | 1.3 | 3.4 | 7.3 | 12 | 15 | 17 | 17 | 15 | 12 | 0.9 |
| 9 | Elon | 0–0 | 0–0 | 5.7–10.3 4–7 W | 11.1–18.9 9–13 W | 0.2 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 3.0 | 5.6 | 8.6 | 13 | 18 | 22 | 25 | 3.0 |
| 10 | UNCW | 0–0 | 0–0 | 4.9–11.1 3–6 W | 10.8–20.2 9–12 W | <1 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 2.6 | 5.5 | 10 | 17 | 26 | 32 | 4.8 |
| 11 | Hampton | 0–0 | 0–0 | 0.8–15.2 0–1 W | 1.8–25.2 1–3 W | <1 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 8.4 | 90 |
Position columns: % of 10,000 simulated seasons finishing there. Row below cut line = P(reach tournament).
Finishing Position Range — Season Progression
HofstraCol. of CharlestonCampbellTowsonN.C. A&TWilliam & MaryStony BrookNortheasternElonUNCWHampton